dialectical reasoning meaning in English
辩证推理
论理（辩证）方法
论理方法
Examples
- Dialectical reasoning needs the " supervision " of analytical reasoning , otherwise it will lead to sophism
辩证理性需要分析理性的“监督” ，否则就会沦为诡辩。 - Actually formal reason and dialectical reason , as two fundamental means for human thinking , are beneficial for each other
作为人类思维的两大基本工具，形式理性和辩证理性之间是互补互益的关系。 - Distinguishing from formal reasoning , dialectical reasoning is a reasoning which can get definite knowledge in the discussion of problems ( topia ) by rebuttal , distinction and induction , when the legal or factual premise is absent , or the premise is controversial . in short , dialectical reasoning is an instrument to seek propositions and conclusions from possibility . in dialectical reasoning , judges often use their own judgments to find a legal or factual precondition
传统的形式主义推理观的机械性和局限性受到越来越多的批判,而现代法律推理学说更加关注非演绎的辩证推理在法律推理过程中的重要作用,哲学诠释学的兴起和实践理性的复归,也使辩证推理在各国的法律实践中普遍运用起来,然而其明显的价值判断倾向使推理过程看起来过于主观。 - Dialectical reasoning appears to loss objectivity with the involvement of judges ’ values and this will undoubtedly shaken the foundation of the rule of law . to regain the objectivity of legal reasoning , the article firstly demonstrates the concept and characters of dialectical reasoning in the comparison with formal reasoning , and proves its advantage over formal reasoning . secondly , the writer gives a positive account of dialectical reasoning . the analysis of the nature of reasoning leads to some arguments against the objectivity of dialectical reasoning
因此本文首先将辩证推理与形式推理进行比较,明确辩证推理的概念以及辩证推理观相对于形式推理观的优势,然后通过对各国的法律适用实践的考察分析辩证推理的思维过程,并以此为基础检讨辩证推理的客观性,从三个角度构建辩证推理客观性的理论基础,最后提出了在我国法律适用实践中保障辩证推理客观性的三条进路,从而使文章具有实践意义。